stumbling toward universal health insurance ?” health affairs W r i t i n g

stumbling toward universal health insurance ?” health affairs W r i t i n g

Appraise the future of the Affordable Care Act. As part of your paper, please identify and discuss any major: policy factors, political factors, judicial factors, interest groups actions, and historical factors. Conclude with your analysis and prediction of the future of the ACA.

You can use the sources provided and you are encouraged to use sources you identify as well. APA format required.

Length: 5 to 7 pages.

Resources:

Rubric

Reflection Rubric

Reflection Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparation

25.0 to >23.0 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry shows evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.

23.0 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry shows evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.

20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry shows some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author demonstrates some knowledge applicable to prompt.

18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry shows little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.

16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry shows no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of content

25.0 to >23.0 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry contains exceptionally thorough and substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) completely.

23.0 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).

20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry contains some relevant information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).

18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) weakly.

16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry does not address the focus question(s).

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal reflection

25.0 to >23.0 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry conveys extensive evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author’s growth through reflection on learning.

23.0 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author is capable of reflecting on learning.

20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s) with a few gaps in clarity; demonstrates the author is capable of some reflection on learning.

18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry conveys little evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s).

16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry shows no personal response to the focus question(s).

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions

25.0 to >23.0 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry shows few, if any errors in standard written English that do not interfered with understanding.

23.0 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry may have some errors in standard written English that rarely interfere with understanding.

20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry has a few errors in standard written English that may interfere with understanding.

18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry has several kinds of errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.

16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry has frequent and severe errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.

25.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0