rubricmoral theory application exercise grading rubricmoral theory application exercise grading rubriccriteriaratingspts H e a l t h M e d i c a l

rubricmoral theory application exercise grading rubricmoral theory application exercise grading rubriccriteriaratingspts H e a l t h M e d i c a l

Identify two scenarios from your life in which you had to break a promise and tell a lie, respectively. Apply each moral theory to your two examples to explain how each theory would justify the action (of breaking a promise and telling a lie). Be sure to cite pertinent course materials to support your knowledge of these theories. Lastly, answer the three short answer questions at the bottom of this template: Moral Theory Application Exercise TemplateLinks to an external site..

(USLOs 2.1, 2.2)

Rubric

Moral Theory Application Exercise Grading Rubric

Moral Theory Application Exercise Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario Descriptionview longer description

threshold: 20.0 pts

20.0 ptsContent is relevant, informative, and remains on topic. Close attention to detail is clearly evident in the two scenarios

15.0 ptsContent is mostly relevant, informative, and may stray off topic one or two times. A fair attention to detail is in the two scenarios

10.0 ptsContent is often irrelevant, and information may be noticeably incorrect or off-topic. A slight lack attention to detail is evident in the two scenarios. Or only one scenario is depicted and is presented well

5.0 ptsContent is irrelevant and information is noticeably incorrect or off-topic. A serious lack of attention to detail is evident in the two scenarios. Or only one scenario is depicted and is presented poorly

0.0 ptsNo scenario descriptions present or did not submit assignment (0 pts)

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisview longer description

threshold: 40.0 pts

40.0 ptsExcellent philosophical analysis of scenarios and moral theories selected. Pertinent course materials supporting knowledge of these theories is supplied

30.0 ptsAdequate philosophical analysis of scenarios and moral theories selected. Pertinent course materials supporting knowledge of these theories is supplied

20.0 ptsInadequate philosophical analysis of scenarios and moral theories selected or pertinent course materials supporting knowledge of these theories is not supplied

10.0 ptsInadequate philosophical analysis of scenarios and moral theories selected and pertinent course materials supporting knowledge of these theories is not supplied

0.0 ptsNo analysis present or did not submit assignment

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShort Answer Questionsview longer description

threshold: 30.0 pts

30.0 ptsAll questions are answered thoroughly and thoughtfully

20.0 ptsAll questions adequately answered but one may be lacking in some detail

10.0 ptsQuestions are inadequately answered but significant details are missing

5.0 ptsVery poorly answered

0.0 ptsNo short answer responses or did not submit assignment

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

10.0 pts

Achievement Level 5

Formatted according to APA guidelines with no errors. Error free APA formatted in-text citations and post-text references

7.0 pts

Achievement Level 4

Formatted according to APA guidelines with no errors. Error free APA formatted in-text citations and post-text references

5.0 pts

Achievement Level 3

Formatted according to APA guidelines with multiple issues. Missing either in-text citations or post-text references

3.0 pts

Achievement Level 2

Significant issues present in the formatting of the title page. Missing both in-text citations or post-text references

0.0 pts

Achievement Level 1

No attempt made to include an in-text citation or full reference or did not submit assignment

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext